SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Test title AI

by Author A

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Author Smith
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202508_00001v1  (pdf)
Date submitted: Aug. 8, 2025, 3:29 p.m.
Submitted by: Smith, Author
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Training
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Biophysics
Disclosure of Generative AI use

The author(s) disclose that the following generative AI tools have been used in the preparation of this submission:

We have used GenericAITool version 2.0 to improve the grammar and overall writing style of the paper.

Abstract

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Current status:
Awaiting resubmission

Reports on this Submission

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2025-8-8 (Invited Report)

Disclosure of Generative AI use

The referee discloses that the following generative AI tools have been used in the preparation of this report:

The entirety of this report was generated using ChatGPT v2

Report

The manuscript raises significant concerns regarding its originality and authenticity, as it exhibits hallmarks of being generated by artificial intelligence. Several sections of the paper demonstrate an unnatural consistency in style, an over-reliance on generic phrasing, and a tendency to obscure or oversimplify complex ideas—traits commonly associated with AI-generated content. While the ideas presented are not inherently incorrect, the lack of nuanced, critical engagement with the literature and the absence of typical human-like errors suggest that much of the analysis may be the product of algorithmic generation rather than scholarly thought. This raises questions about the paper’s adherence to academic integrity standards, as well as its true contribution to the field. Further scrutiny of the methodologies and references is needed to determine whether the work is truly the product of human authorship.

Recommendation

Reject

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Author:  Author Smith  on 2025-08-08  [id 2]

(in reply to Report 1 on 2025-08-08)
Disclosure of Generative AI use

The comment author discloses that the following generative AI tools have been used in the preparation of this comment:

ChatGPT v2 was used to produce the entirety of this reply

Thank you for your review and the concerns you raised regarding the manuscript. I would like to acknowledge that, in the interest of improving the quality and efficiency of my writing, I did utilize generative AI tools to assist with certain sections of the paper, primarily for drafting and organizing ideas. While I ensured that all the core concepts and analysis were my own, the AI was used as a supplementary tool to streamline the process, much like a word processor or grammar checker might be. I understand how this might give the impression of a lack of originality, but I want to emphasize that the research, critical thinking, and overall contributions are entirely my own. I value academic integrity and would be happy to discuss how the AI was used and provide more context on its role in the writing process.

Login to report or comment